Please call 020 7353 6802 or complete the form below:
Charlotte is an award-winning barrister with an extensive family law practice in complex trials and appellate cases, often encompassing ground-breaking fields of law. Ranked as Legal 500’s Leading Junior, Charlotte acts in high value matrimonial finance cases, private law children, child abduction, surrogacy and serious care cases. She has represented and advised high-profile public and political figures. Charlotte has been shortlisted for a number of awards, Family Law Junior Barrister of the Year, Rising Star and Woman Lawyer of the Year 2020.
As a Junior Research Fellow at Queens’ College, Cambridge, Charlotte researches and lectures on gender inequality under the law and female genital mutilation (“FGM”). Charlotte’s book about the efficacy of anti-FGM laws is soon to be published by Oxford University Press. Charlotte was awarded her Doctorate in FGM law and policy from King’s College, Cambridge and she was a Visiting Researcher at Berkeley Law School and Harvard Law School.
As an advocate for change, Charlotte was instrumental in drafting amendments to the Domestic Abuse Bill, introducing FGM Protection Orders and criminalising forced marriage. She is a legal advisor to Our Streets Now, a campaign to criminalise sexual harassment and Girls Not Brides UK which aims to criminalise child marriage.
‘Has built up an excellent practice in family law well beyond her year of call. She is a leading thinker and expert on gender based violence and family law’, Leading Junior Barrister, Legal 500
“Charlotte is never shy of helping us test the boundaries of the law, or of tackling a relatively new form of domestic abuse, widespread image-based abuse (revenge porn), or raising novel arguments arising under the Equality Act, which have yet to be tested in court. Too many shy away from the untrodden or difficult path, Charlotte is not one of these”. Georgina Calvert-Lee, Senior Counsel, McAllister and Olivarius.
“Charlotte is not afraid to bring novel challenges that look to have wider policy implications. She is passionate about making the legal system more accountable in its treatment of women and girls”. Mitchell Woolf, Solicitor, Scott-Moncrieff & Associates Ltd.
“I instructed Charlotte in a complex child abduction case that was appealed to the Court of Appeal. Her advice and written representations were outstanding. Her dedication to vulnerable clients, particularly those who are victims of abuse, is exemplary”. Cris McCurley, Head of International Family Law, Ben Hoare Bell LLP.
“Charlotte always delivers! She is a breath of fresh air after some 25 years of working with the Bar. In the last 12 months she achieved some 7 results in ToLATA and financial proceedings where the results achieved exceeded the hoped for result of the client”. Karen Agnew-Griffith, solicitor, Woolley & Co Solicitors.
“Dr Proudman has always secured good outcomes and has been commended on her efforts by my clients. She is fully committed to each case, matching a thoroughly professional approach with sensitivity to the needs of the lay client”. Priti Gill, Legal Executive, Horne Engall & Freeman LLP.
“Charlotte picked up the reigns of a financial relief upon divorce case at very short notice and achieved a brilliant result, leaving the client ecstatically happy”. Nigel Fisher, solicitor, Taylor Rose TTKW.
“In my opinion, she is a leader in the field of FGM law whose research has made a significant contribution to scholarship in this area and has had an impact on case law and law reform in England and Wales”. Professor Felicity Gerry QC, Barrister.
“Charlotte has excellent knowledge in the area of female genital mutilation law. She demonstrates commitment to and passion for this area of work. I have been most impressed by her professionalism and swift response especially with pro bono cases that are often at very short notice. On behalf of the families that Charlotte has supported and is continuing to support, I would like to send her our sincere gratitude”. The National FGM Centre.
“Charlotte is meticulous in her preparation and case strategy, which vastly improves the chances of securing a desired outcome. She is also very good in establishing a strong rapport with her clients.” Direct access client, financial remedy and private law children case.
Please call 020 7353 6802 or complete the form below:
Financial relief on divorce: Specialising in high value financial relief cases where assets are in excess of several millions with complex structures. Charlotte has a wealth of experience in matrimonial finances applications, variation of maintenance claims, pre- and post-nuptial agreements, Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 applications, property claims between unmarried partners and intervener claims and Court of Protection cases in which property and finances are disputed. She is an expert in Islamic marriage, divorce and dowry payments including nullity applications.
FGM: As ‘the expert’ in FGM, Charlotte has been instructed in six reported, precedent-setting FGMPO cases involving risk of FGM, travel bans and failed FGM asylum claims. Charlotte was junior counsel in Re A (A Child: Female Genital Mutilation: Asylum  EWHC 2475 before the President of the Family Division and later the Court of Appeal in which the President of the Family Division gave guidance about the interrelationship between FGMPOs and FGM asylum. The high-profile case was featured in The Guardian, The BBC and Sky News. She was junior counsel in the leading case of Re X (Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order No.2)  EWHC 1990 (Fam) in which the High Court issued guidance about the macro and micro considerations for a travel restrictions in FGM cases. Charlotte was instrumental in the introduction of FGM Protection Orders and the pilot Practice Direction 36H. Charlotte is a Gender-based Violence expert for the European Institute for Gender Equality and she was invited by the UN to advise on a UN Human Rights Council Resolution about FGM. Charlotte is currently collaborating with the End FGM European Network to encourage EU nation states to adopt FGMPOs to prevent FGM.
Private law children and domestic abuse: Charlotte specialises in complex cases regarding domestic abuse and parental alienation. Charlotte has single-handedly successfully appealed cases where the family courts have failed to have regard to allegations of domestic abuse and ordered contact between a parent and child contrary to PD12J. She is working on a number of Human Rights Act claims that directly challenge the family court’s approach in failing to have regard to the impact of domestic abuse on victims and children leaving them at risk of harm. She has appeared on the BBC and published in the Independent about the family court’s failure to address domestic abuse. Charlotte was co-author of an open letter signed by over 130 leaders calling for major changes to the family court’s approach in domestic abuse cases, which resulted in the government adopting a number of our recommendations. Charlotte is working closely with MPs and women’s rights organisations to draft pioneering amendments to the Domestic Abuse Bill to protect victims and children from domestic abuse.
Public law children cases: Known for her advocacy in cases involving serious allegations of non-accidental injury, sexual abuse and emotional harm, she is regularly instructed in care cases. She acts in cases involving a re-opening of findings of fact; child sexual exploitation and trafficking; and challenges to Section 20 of the Children Act 1989 where children have been unlawfully accommodated by the local authority resulting in successful claims for damages.
Child abduction: Charlotte specialises in child abduction particularly cases involving an Article 13(b) defence due to a risk of domestic abuse and in cases where there are complex immigration issues. She has appealed such cases to the Court of Appeal. Charlotte was instructed in S v S  EWHC 1298 (Fam) which concerned the risk of domestic abuse in Iran and in Re Rodwell  EWHC 1731 (Fam) where habitual residence was in dispute.
Surrogacy: Charlotte is renowned for her experience in surrogacy and adoption. She acted in C (A Child: Parental Order & Child Arrangements Order)  EWHC 2474 in which a child had resulted from a surrogacy arrangement and the wife had then arranged a further surrogacy without the husband’s knowledge, and they had subsequently separated.
Court of Protection cases: Charlotte has experience in Court of Protection cases involving the welfare and management of property and affairs of persons lacking capacity. She is sensitive to the needs of vulnerable persons and can provide a thoughtful and empathetic approach.
Selected Training and Conferences
Re E, S and Y (Children: Care and Placement Orders)  EWFC B2 (02 February 2021) Dr Proudman represented a mother opposing a care order and placement order in respect of her three children. The local authority alleged domestic abuse between the mother and her former partners causing the children harm. Findings were made in respect of domestic abuse. The court also found that one of the fathers physically assaulted a child, which constituted non-accidental injury. The court made a number of serious findings relating to domestic abuse and neglect in the family home. The court made a care order and a placement order in respect of the three children. The decision shows the serious orders that can be made by the family courts in domestic abuse cases to ensure that children are not harmed in the family household.
CD v Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council (adoption set aside) (Rev 1)  EWHC 3411 (Fam). Dr Charlotte Proudman represented children’s relatives whom applied for care, placement and adoption orders to be revoked. Applying for care, placement and adoption orders to be revoked is a very high test to meet. Dr Proudman was instructed on behalf of the children’s family members to make this application on the basis that they had not been thorough assessed by the local authority prior to the final orders being made.
SS v MCP  EWHC 2971 (Fam) Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the Mother in a child abduction case in which the Father had applied for the immediate return of the child from India to the UK. The Mother opposed the Father’s application. The court found that the child is habitually resident in India having spent around two years there. However, the court held that the legal position in respect of whether the court retains jurisdiction to make orders in respect of the child was unclear due to the ambiguity of the territorial reach of article 10 of Brussels 2. As such, the court referred the case to the Court of Justice for an urgent preliminary ruling.
C (A Child: Parental Order & Child Arrangements Order)  EWHC 2474 (Fam) and C (A Child: Parental Order & Child Arrangements Order)  EWHC 2141 (Fam). Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the local authority following an application on behalf of the husband and wife for a parental order. A child had resulted from a surrogacy arrangement and the wife had then arranged a further surrogacy without the husband’s knowledge or consent.
AB v AN & Anor  EWHC 2048 (Fam). Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother in application for an FGMPO on behalf of her daughter at risk of FGM in Nigeria. The family do not have secure immigration status. The mother applied for expert assessments and the appointment of a children’s guardian.
Re A (A Child) (Rev 1)  EWCA Civ 731. Karon Monaghan QC and Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother before the Court of Appeal in an FGMPO case. The court upheld the decision of the President namely that the family court has a duty to form its own assessment of risk of FGM unencumbered by the outcome of a materially different process in the immigration jurisdiction.
Re A (A child) (Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order Application) (Rev 1)  EWHC 323. Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother at a final hearing in an FGMPO case in which the court found that the girl would be at a high risk of FGM if she is returned to Bahrain or Sudan.
Re A (A Child: Female Genital Mutilation: Asylum  EWHC 2475. Karon Monaghan QC and Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother in an application for a FGMPO on behalf of her daughter before the President of the Family Division. The President ordered that the family court cannot prohibit the Home Secretary from removing a girl at high risk of FGM from this jurisdiction. The family court must conduct its own risk assessment of FGM even when the immigration tribunal has conducted an earlier risk assessment.
Re X (Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order. No.2)  EWHC 1990 (Fam). Nkumbe Ekaney QC and Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the mother in an application for a FGMPO on behalf of her daughter. The local authority applied for a travel ban to prohibit a girl from leaving the jurisdiction to visit her father in Egypt due to a risk of FGM. After various expert reports, the court allowed the child to visit the father in Egypt for a short trip. The court gave guidance on both the macro and the micro factors that must be taken into account when deciding whether a travel ban ought to be imposed in a case where FGM is a risk.
X v Y  EWHC 1713 (Fam). Frank Feehan QC and Dr Charlotte Proudman represented the appellant in an application for permission to appeal the trial judge’s decision concerning a financial remedy and child arrangements order.
BA & Anor v JA & Ors (female genital mutilation protection orders and immigration appeals) EWHC 1754 (Fam). The court gave guidance that an application for an FGMPO should only be made when the family’s immigration appeal rights have been exhausted.
B v M  EWHC 1473 (Fam). Charlotte was led by Frank Feehan QC of 1KBW in a public law children fact-finding hearing in which they represented private foster carers who had fostered a child for several years. The judge found that the parents abandoned the child and the local authority breached its duties under the private fostering regulations. The judgment issued important guidance on the duties under private fostering arrangements.
AAM v KG  EWHC 283 (Fam). Charlotte represented the appellant who appealed the trial judge’s order of nullity on the ground of polygamy. The case involved issues of validity of marriages overseas, the necessity of documentary evidence proving the existence of a marriage and the relevance of expert evidence.
S v S  EWHC 1298 (Fam). Application for the return of a child to Iran after the child had been abducted to England and Wales. The case involved serious allegations of sexual abuse, forced lesbianism, domestic abuse and the risk of state punishment in Iran.
Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited (Appellant) v Ryan and another (Respondents) (Trinidad and Tobago)  UKPC 30. Charlotte was led by Jonathan Crystal and Romie Tager QC in an appeal upheld by the Privy Council to set aside the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the trial judge’s findings concerning the escape of hydrocarbon fumes from an oil well causing medical injuries.
Rodwell  EWHC 1731 (Fam). Charlotte represented the applicant father who sought the return of his children to Spain but the children’s whereabouts were unknown and they were unlikely to be habitually resident in England and Wales, thus the court had no jurisdiction.
Charlotte is experienced in judicial review cases that overlap with family law including asylum claims, unaccompanied minors, Article 8 ECHR and domestic violence ILR route. With extensive experience in violence against women and girls internationally, Charlotte specialises in cases involving FGM, honour-based violence, trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation and religious conversion.
Charlotte is often successful in such cases including: an 18-year-old girl at risk of FGM in Sierra Leone; Tamil family at risk of violence in Sri Lanka; woman trafficked from Albania to England and sexually exploited; Nigerian woman beaten by her husband and successfully applied for ILR on the basis of domestic violence; and an Iranian woman who converted to Christianity.
Human rights claims: Charlotte is adept at raising novel legal challenges that have the potential to be ground-breaking. Charlotte is an expert in Judicial Review, Equality Act claims and Human Rights Act claims in civil, family and immigration cases. She is instructed in claims against local authorities for failing to comply with their duties to children, sexual harassment cases on university campuses and so-called revenge porn cases.
Follow Goldsmith Chambers